The conquest of Subah Bengal by the British East India Company in 1764 led to a transcendental change in the socio-economic-political conditions of India. Slowly, after an accurate survey of the fertility of land and other available resources, the British East India Company introduced the Permanent Settlement Act in 1793. This act transformed the status of not only the ryots or peasants but also the erstwhile ruling chiefs of the region. The ruling chiefs became zamindars who were accountable for collecting land revenue of their respective region and got 10% as administrative cost and 15% as remuneration. The ryots became just tenants as far as the land was concerned.
The introduction of the Permanent Settlement Act was not digested by the ruling chiefs leading to a revolt. Prominently amongst these chiefs [1] were Hussepur [2], Darbhanga, Bettiah, Ramgarh, Benaras, Tikari, and Dumraon. The fight continued both on the battlefields and in the court and ultimately by 1848, a working truce was established with some give and take. However, the aggrieved ruling class were not satisfied and kept looking for an opportune moment. Concurrent with the Permanent Settlement Act came an introduction of agro-industries such as sugar and jute mills, Indigo and opium manufacturing units and saltpetre production. Darbhanga, though not happy with the change in status, realized that the world order was changing and the economic status of a person or state would determine its power in future. On one hand the industrial sector was growing but the atrocities of the British led to a war of independence in the middle of the 19th century. The disgruntled ruling chiefs now turned into zamindars got another opportunity in 1857 to overthrow the British East India Company rule. However, scattered revolts and lack of proper leadership failed them, not leading to freedom. On the contrary, with the defeat of Indian rulers, the British Crown took over India from the British East India Company. The Crown tried to please the Indians by doing away with the atrocious rules brought into practice by the East India Company. However a few years after the war in 1857, a need was felt to bring people together for a mass awakening in order to throw away the British rule.
The members of the Congress had a cordial relationship with Maharaja too. At the fourteenth session of the Congress held at Madras in 1898, a resolution expressing grief at the passing away of the Maharaja was issued [6]:
That this Congress deeply mourns the great loss the country has suffered by the sad and untimely death of the late Maharaja of Darbhanga, Sir Lakshniessur Singh Bahadur, G.C.l.E. The Congress places on record its high appreciation of his ready and enlightened public spirit and his liberal and catholic benefactions, and desires to give expression to its feeling of gratitude for the generous and unfailing support which the Congress movement received at his hands; and that a copy of the foregoing resolution be forwarded to Maharaja Rameshwar Singh, the brother of the deceased Maharaja. After Maharaja Lakshmishwar Singh, his brother Maharaja Rameshwar Singh also had cordial relations with the Congress. So much so that in 1906 at the Indian National Congress Meeting, he had offered his palace in Calcutta for hosting meetings [7]. Apart from this, he also tried to bridge between the British authorities and Indian leaders. In 1917, when Gandhiji visited Champaran the local British authorities sought permission from the Governor to take strict action. The Governor sought the counsel of Maharaja Rameshwara Singh who in turn dissuaded the Governor from taking any strict action against Gandhiji [8]. The Indian National Congress benefited from the benevolence of Maharaja Rameshwara Singh throughout his lifetime. When Maharaja Kameshwar Singh ascended the throne, Gandhiji was the dominant face of the Indian National Congress. The relationship of Gandhiji with the Darbhanga Raj which started in the time of Maharaja Lakshmishwar Singh, got strengthened by the time Maharaja Kameshwar Singh took over the Raj. Although the two were well acquainted, it was only after the Earthquake of 1934 that Mahatma visited Darbhanga. It was during Gandhiji’s tours in the earthquake affected areas in Bihar that he had a meeting with Maharaja Kameshwar Singh. The decade of the 1930s was very crucial for the Congress and the Mahatma. During this time, Gandhiji’s clay feet got exposed and on the other hand, it was exposed that the Congress leaders had put their self-interests above the nation as can be inferred from the incident below. Although Gandhiji’s tour was claimed as a great success by the Congress and to some extent it had helped the relief committee to gather some fundings, the Congress party itself was not in order. On one hand the members professed of khadi and home spun cotton but on other hand they tried to gain some profit from the foreign cloth sales [9]. The Congress party had even resolved to tactics of blackmailing as they were reported to have done in reference to the Maharaja’s trip to London. The leaders had threatened to wave black flags when the Maharaja would board train for his voyage to London [10]. The relationship of the Congress leaders with Maharaja Kameshwar Singh is depicted nicely through the incident reported by the then governor of Bihar in his personal notes of 1939. Governor Hallett of Bihar put a personal note on an album of photographs taken on the occasion of the House Warming Party of the house of Maharajadhiraja of Darbhanga at Ranchi. He writes: This volume of photographs was presented to me by the Maharajadhiraja of Darbhanga after a party which he had given to celebrate the completion of his house in Ranchi. The Congress Ministry was then in office and they had received instructions from Mahatma Gandhi not to accept any hospitality from the Governor or from any members of the civil service and not to attend any parties at which they were present. The Maharajadhiraja however managed to persuade them to attend the dinner party which he gave on the opening of his new house and to get round the veto, and the photographs show how much the Ministers enjoyed the evening which was the first time some of them had met any English ladies. I warned the Maharajadhiraja that it might be desirable to avoid the press notices appearing at the function as it might cause the Congress leaders to find fault with the Bihar Ministers; actually a paragraph did appear in the papers merely mentioning my personal name and my official title! [11] Maharaja Kameshwar Singh, on many occasions stood in support of the Congress party. He was well respected by the old generation of the Indian National Congress. Writing his obituary in 1962, late Jankinandan Singh, President of Darbhanga District Congress Committee and Member of Legislative Council in Bihar, wrote that Once Mahatma Gandhi came with Mahamana Malaviyaji and Dr. Rajendra Prasad to Darbhanga for collecting funds. They met the Maharaja and were expecting a donation of rupees one lakh but the Maharaja overwhelmed them by donating Rupees Seven Lakhs [12]. The Congress party had a very complex relationship with the Maharajas of Darbhanga. The party which had benefited from the Darbhanga Raj in its early days had taken a stand against the Maharaja post independence maybe because the politics in India had changed on social as well as economic level after 1947.
References
Team
Citation Policy
Subscribe
Whenever we publish new content, we would send you an email. To stay updated, sign up!
Reaching Readers
Reaching Readers is a weekly campaign organized by our community to support enthusiastic readers by shipping one paperback of their choice for free. If you are interested, apply for your copy today!
Comments
|